| |

Schwinn 230 Vs 270 Schwinn Recumbent Bikes Compared

Recumbent bikes are the latest trend in the fitness industry for low impact workout, which is easy on your joints. As compared to upright bikes, recumbent bikes are more comfortable for the user.   Upright bikes put more pressure on the lower back as the user is hunched down on the handlebars whereas recumbent bikes are very forgiving for the lower back and the user is sitting just like he’s sitting in the chair in his office or at home.

Recumbent bikes are easier on the lumbar back, have a larger seat, an excellent choice for people with neurological conditions and is generally low impact and safer for the user.

Schwinn is the leading manufacturer of bikes, and Schwinn 230 and 270 are one of the highly-rated recumbent bikes in the market today.


First, let’s talk about the similarities. Both Schwinn 230 and 270 are sleek and modern bikes with silent magnetic design. They are very adjustable and can fit anybody between 4 feet 11 inches and 6 feet 3 inches with the weight of up to 300 lbs.  They have wide pedals with foot straps and heart rate monitor, even though it’s not very accurate. They has front wheels, so can be moved around easily.


Even though both bikes are similar in performance and mechanicals, there is a significant difference in their features and construction.


270 has 29 programs as compared to 22 of 230

User Profiles:

Schwinn 270 can keep up to four user profiles as compared to two user profiles for should 230. If you have a bigger family who are going to use a recumbent bike, then Schwinn 270 is a better choice


Schwinn 270 has 25 level resistance as compared to 20 levels of resistance of 230

Heart Rate Monitor:

Schwinn 270 has grip and telemetry based heart rate monitor whereas Schwinn 230 has only grip based heart rate monitor, which is woefully inaccurate.


Monitor screen of swim 230 is not backlit whereas 270 has a blue backlit and better quality monitor screen.


One feature where 270 beats 230 hands down is their seats. 270 has thick-padded contoured seat bottom with a large vented backrest which is very comfortable. 230 also has a contoured seat but its not vented and not very comfortable.


One thing where 270 differs from 230 mechanically is their crank. 270 has a three-piece crank which is much stronger than the one piece crank of 230


270 has Bluetooth connectivity, so it connects with the many apps whereas 230 only has USB connectivity, so the data has to be updated manually to the app.


Schwinn 270 is priced in the range of above 1000 dollars whereas you can get a Schwinn 230 at around $500, which is a very value for money price for the recumbent bike of this quality. 

Which one should you buy

If you are looking at an entry-level bike on a budget then Schwinn 230 is a perfect choice for you. It has most of the mechanical features of the more expensive 270 but doesn’t have all the bells and whistles of 270. 

If you are looking for a sturdy recumbent bike which lasts many years, then 270 should be your choice. It has better comfortable seating, better-backlit monitor screen and Bluetooth connectivity which helps you send all your data to the app instantly.  Plus it has a better construction which will last for many years to come.

Similar Posts